Village Law Firm Launches Lifelong Estate Plan Service

Oct 10, 2026

The Village Law Firm introduces an ongoing estate planning service that moves beyond documents to protect modern families over time.

New York City, New York, United States, October 10, 2026 -- The Village Law Firm, a boutique estate planning and administration practice based in New York City, has announced the expansion of a comprehensive, relationship-based approach to estate planning designed for the realities of modern family life. The firm, founded by estate planning attorney Shannon McNulty, aims to replace the traditional transactional model, which centers on a binder of signed documents, with an ongoing partnership that keeps a family's plan current and functional for years to come.

The announcement reflects a growing recognition that estate planning does not end when a client signs a will or trust. According to the firm, many plans fail not because the documents were poorly drafted, but because they were never fully implemented or updated as a family's circumstances changed.

Rethinking the Document-First Model

For decades - or even centuries - the standard estate planning process has followed a familiar pattern. A client meets with an attorney, reviews a set of documents, signs them, and leaves with a binder that is often filed away and forgotten. The Village Law Firm believes that this approach no longer meets the needs of families whose lives are more complex and more global than ever before.

Modern clients may hold accounts in multiple countries, store digital currency, own several investment properties, or carry stock options in a technology start-up. A plan that captures these assets on paper but is never put into practice can leave families exposed during an emergency.

"A will that no one can find is worthless. A trust that was never funded controls nothing," said Shannon McNulty, founder of The Village Law Firm. "A plan that captured your wishes perfectly on the day it was signed, but hasn't been reviewed since your second child was born, since you moved to a new house, since you started a business, may bear almost no resemblance to the life it was meant to protect."

The firm's position is that the documents are only one component of a complete plan. The remaining components, which include funding trusts, updating beneficiaries, retitling accounts, and preparing guidance for the people who will one day act on a client's behalf, are often where traditional planning falls short.

A Plan Built Around Life, Not Paperwork

Rather than beginning with a template set of documents, The Village Law Firm begins with the client's life and family. The attorneys examine how a family actually functions, what assets exist, where they are located, and what continuity the family would need if a loss occurred. Only after that review does the firm implement documents and other tools intended to provide that continuity.

This sequence is deliberate because the goal is practical readiness rather than theoretical completeness. Following the loss of a loved one, few people want to begin searching for a will or guessing at account passwords. They want a trusted point of contact who can guide them, step by step, through one of the most difficult periods of their lives.

To support that goal, the firm helps clients create an inventory of assets, a plan for digital assets, and written guidance for the guardians or trustees who may be called upon in the future. The intention is to ensure that a family is not left to reconstruct a plan during a crisis.

An Ongoing Partnership, Not a One-Time Transaction

The firm’s expanded service centers on an ongoing client relationship that continues after documents are signed. Clients receive annual reviews, plan updates, secure document storage, and a reliable point of contact for family members during emergencies.

Because life changes through marriages, births, relocations, business formations, and shifts in wealth, regular reviews help keep estate plans aligned with current circumstances.

The firm describes this approach as a lifelong partnership, allowing plans to evolve with clients while providing families with a consistent resource for guidance when needed.

Best Estate Planning Attorney in New York of 2026

Best of Best Review has honored Shannon McNulty, founder of The Village Law Firm, as the Best Estate Planning Attorney in New York of 2026. The award recognizes her dedication to developing personalized estate plans that reflect each family’s circumstances, financial interests, and future goals.

McNulty’s approach combines legal expertise with continued guidance, helping clients put their plans into action and adapt them as life changes. Through The Village Law Firm, she strives to protect family legacies, simplify complex planning decisions, and provide lasting peace of mind.

Serving Global and Complex Families

A significant area of focus for The Village Law Firm is its work with global families. Clients with ties to more than one country face layered challenges, including assets governed by different legal systems, cross-border tax considerations, and the logistics of administering an estate that spans jurisdictions. The firm has a developed practice in coordinating these elements so that an international plan functions when needed and not only on paper.

Beyond global families, the firm serves a broad range of clients, including families with young children, blended families, LGBTQ+ individuals, families with children who have special needs, and high-net-worth households seeking asset protection. The firm also provides Medicaid planning and estate administration services, advising executors, beneficiaries, and those handling international administration. More information about these services is available on the firm's website at www.thevillagelawfirm.com.

Client Response

Clients have described the firm's process as thorough, approachable, and reassuring. In a public Google review, client Dylan Cali wrote that the firm "helped make the process as painless and seamless as possible" and provided "the peace of mind of having an established firm I can rely on for the long-term."

Another client, Roberto Gil, noted that he found the firm through an online advertisement rather than a referral and was initially cautious, but added that "it took no time to build trust and get comfortable." A third client described the experience of setting up a living trust, power of attorney, and health care proxy for a family with three young children, highlighting the support the firm offered in moving assets into the trust after the documents were complete.

Resources and Education

In addition to its legal services, The Village Law Firm maintains a library of educational resources, including blog articles, publications, webinars, a newsletter, and events intended to help the public understand estate planning in clear terms. The firm shares guidance across several channels, including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and its YouTube channel. Email directly to [email protected].

The firm emphasizes a white-glove, efficient process tailored to busy professionals in New York City, with an aim of reducing the anxiety that often surrounds life-and-death matters through transparent communication and dependable follow-through.

About The Village Law Firm

The Village Law Firm is a boutique New York City estate planning and administration practice focused on helping modern families protect their futures. The firm specializes in comprehensive planning for families with children, blended families, LGBTQ+ individuals, global families, families with children who have special needs, and high-net-worth households seeking asset protection. Services include estate planning, Medicaid planning, and estate administration. The firm distinguishes itself through its comprehensive approach, its lifelong partnership with clients, and its work with global families.

Contact Info:
Name: Shannon McNulty
Email: Send Email
Organization: The Village Law Firm
Website: https://www.thevillagelawfirm.com

Release ID: 89205766

If you come across any problems, discrepancies, or concerns related to the content contained within this press release that necessitate action or if a press release requires takedown, we strongly encourage you to reach out without delay by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our committed team will be readily accessible round-the-clock to address your concerns within 8 hours and take appropriate actions to rectify identified issues or support with press release removals. Ensuring accurate and reliable information remains our unwavering commitment.

More News
Why Francesca Hong is still on the campaign trail
Oct 10, 2026

Why Francesca Hong is still on the campaign trail

Francesca Hong, a representative in the Wisconsin State Assembly, poses for a photo with a supporter in Racine, Wisconsin, on July 19, 2026. | Sara Stathas for the Washington Post via Getty Images The Wisconsin gubernatorial race was one of the most closely watched Democratic primaries in the country this year, pitting a democratic socialist, state Rep. Francesca Hong, against Milwaukee Democrat David Crowley, who received the endorsement of the state’s sitting Democratic governor, Tony Evers. Hong lost the race, setting up Crowley to face Republican Rep. Tom Tiffany in the general election this fall. But she’s already back on the campaign trail, this time trying to help Democrats win a trifecta in the state: the governor’s race and both legislative chambers. Unifying the state’s voters to achieve that won’t be easy, though. Hong spoke with America, Actually host Astead Herndon about her own loss, Evers’s role in it, and whether or not the voters who felt so passionate about her own campaign would find enough to love in Crowley’s campaign — in particular on the increasingly important issue of data centers.  Astead and Hong also talked about what Wisconsin means for the Democrats nationally, and what lessons the party should take from her race, including her loss. “I said this, and I will continue to say it — the person who is most electable is the person who ended up getting the most votes, and that was Crowley this time around,” Hong said. “But I think there’s a disservice when you have the most powerful Democrat in the state choosing to ignore a lot of voters and people who were inspired and energized and coming out to participate in politics for the first time through our campaign. I think it was shortsighted to use electability almost as a fear tactic.” Below is an excerpt of Astead’s conversation with Hong, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full show, so listen to America, Actually wherever you get your podcasts or watch it on Vox’s YouTube channel. Part of the reason we wanted to come here was because we saw you were getting back on the campaign trail, and specifically around that idea of energizing Wisconsin toward a trifecta. Now, just tell me the difference in terms of the importance of Democrats winning it all — not only the governor’s mansion, but both houses of the state legislature — versus just the governor’s mansion. How does that change the possibilities of what the party could do? For the last 16 years, a Republican majority in the state legislature has meant that passing the types of policies that we know can drastically improve the lives of everyday folks here in Wisconsin stalled. And we have a historic opportunity to flip the assembly and the state Senate and hold the governor’s mansion and the entire executive branch to a Democratic majority, meaning the opportunity to pass the policies that the majority of our state supports — things like increasing minimum wage, things like legalizing marijuana, codifying abortion.  We also need to repeal Act 10 [which dramatically restricted collective bargaining rights for public-sector employees]. Wisconsin is where workers’ rights, things like unemployment insurance, Social Security were born, and we moved backwards with the Republican majority. That’s all on the table with the Democratic trifecta. It also, though, raises the political standard of what Democrats would have to do to achieve that, and some of it goes through these more rural communities. Why do we think the party has fallen behind in more rural communities, and what could be done to reverse that? I think it’s important to look at what’s happened in the rural communities when we’ve seen manufacturing jobs leave the state, when we’ve seen fewer and fewer supports for our small farmers. And so much of this — what connects it — is actually the growth of massive wealth and corporate control and corporate greed, and more people feeling the impacts of that. There’s an opportunity right now to say, ‘Hey, Republicans have been in the legislature, they’ve been in power, and things have not improved for you or your community … Now’s the opportunity to make sure that we’re actually able to see our shared Wisconsin values of working hard and taking care of our kids be reflected back in Madison through laws.’ So much of your campaign was focused on data centers, stopping data centers. Should I think of that as a rural issue? I think the issue around data centers is an everyone issue. It’s a democracy issue. It’s people wanting to feel like there are folks who care about what happens to communities, and that they have control and an actual say in what happens in their communities. To that point, is it a mistake for David Crowley, the Democratic nominee, to have not gone as far as you did and say, “We won’t be building more data centers for a period of time”? He’s fighting for communities and community control when it comes to data centers. But it’s not a moratorium. But it’s not a moratorium. It isn’t, but he’s also committed to 100 percent renewable energy, clean energy to power data centers. And achieving that is going to be incredibly difficult, and it is going to be the developers having to pay their own way, and these are things that he’s committed to that we know can slow down the growth and development of data centers.  Have you had time to reflect on your primary loss? If you had to diagnose, why do you think you lost? I’m still doing a lot of reflection. But I think that I want to continue to look forward. And what I’ve learned from our election is that it’s so important to continue to stay grounded in becoming accessible to people. I think that as an organizer and an elected official, it’s my responsibility to continue to go to the people and remain very in touch with what’s going on on the ground. I have a couple more questions about the nature of the loss. Evers’s endorsement changed that race, so much so that your opponent David Crowley was able even to win in some smaller communities, like places where you were pitching yourself as the voice of more rural communities. Does that disprove any of this thesis around, say, data centers? If that was the top priority for Wisconsin voters, wouldn’t you be the nominee? I think it wasn’t all rural communities. It wasn’t all suburban communities. We saw certain demographics but also ZIP codes where we outperformed David significantly. And I think that where the governor’s endorsement played a bigger role was areas where he was also more popular.  Did it surprise you when Evers endorsed Crowley? I was disappointed. Why? I was disappointed because I was getting a lot of feedback from folks who hadn’t committed to any candidate yet that this felt like the governor was putting his thumb on the scale. I wanted to ask about electability, because it seemed as if Evers’s endorsement was about a fear that maybe you couldn’t win in November. So much of the primary concern was around the DSA label, even campaigning with folks like Hasan Piker. In retrospect, was any of that a mistake? We knew going in that we would have to encourage new voters to come out, folks who typically do not come out for primaries, quote-unquote low-propensity voters. And we knew that we would have to campaign in places where folks weren’t expecting to see a gubernatorial candidate. And those included Twitch streams. Those also included going to dive bars and bowling alleys and making sure that we were accessible and shaping our policies based on what the people were telling us they wanted to see happen and also what they wanted to see out of their governor. I think electability… I said this, and I will continue to say it — the person who is most electable is the person who ended up getting the most votes, and that was Crowley this time around. But I think there’s a disservice when you have the most powerful Democrat in the state choosing to ignore a lot of voters and people who were inspired and energized and coming out to participate in politics for the first time through our campaign. I think it was shortsighted to use electability almost as a fear tactic, when Democrats need to be inspiring and project a vision where everyone can see themselves in it as everyday working-class folks. When you’ve got a party that has struggled with elitism to then cave to an establishment narrative … being more afraid of labels when I’m hearing from people on the ground that they’re interested in solutions and solving problems, maybe somebody who knows the hustle of the service industry and running restaurants and has worked across the aisle to pass bipartisan legislation. There are ways that we can maneuver around labels and what the loudest narrative might be. I wish our governor hadn’t fed into that. To be fair, to your point, the establishment label doesn’t fully fit even someone like Crowley, who comes from a working-class background. But am I hearing that you think Evers’s move made your life in the general election more difficult? Is it harder to re-inspire if young people who are invested in the Hong campaign think that the establishment squashed them out? We still had over 300,000 votes. We lost by fewer than 4,000 votes. I had more votes than Evers did during his primary. That’s not squashing our voices. We’re still here, and it’s so important that people find avenues to continue to exercise their voice and their new organizing power. And I’m definitely going to continue to work to make sure that we get results and that we win the trifecta, and that’s the most important thing we should be focusing on right now. I hear why a trifecta matters in the state context, particularly the state policy. If I’m someone, though, who’s not in Wisconsin, who’s just worried about Donald Trump running amok in Washington, why should I care if Democrats win the governor’s mansion and the state legislature? Does that matter for folks outside of the state? Because we will start to

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

Copyright © 2015 - 2026 Daily Transport. All Rights Reserved.

About Us

Thailand Tribunal is the country’s next generation of digital news portal, bringing you non-stop news on the happenings in the country and all over the world.

Subscribe Now!